Emergent Collaboration Vendor Review: Mango Apps

January 13th, 2012

On Friday’s I’ll be reviewing a vendor in the emergent collaboration space and will provide an overview on that vendor which includes aspects from leadership and vision to technology and market focus. If you are vendor that would like to participate, please contact me (email is in the sidebar as is the twitter link). The goal of these posts is not to bash or praise vendors but to simply offer an objective view on what various vendors offer so that YOU can decide if they are a good fit for your business. Every post will cover the same elements for different vendors. If you have ideas or recommendations for other items to be covered in these posts then please let me know and I will consider them.

This week I’m taking a look at Mango Spring (the product itself is called Mango Apps) which is headquartered in Bellevue, Washington and Pune, India.  Mango Spring has been around for four years, has 70 employees, and as of today is privately funded.  I spoke with Patrick Allman, the VP of worldwide sales.

Integration capabilities

Out of the box Mango integrates with Outlook, Sharepoint, Alfresco, and about 35 other popular document repositories.  In addition Mango can also provide for custom integration’s (such as with Salesforce or SAP) for larger clients with either private cloud or on-premise deployments (such as with Salesforce).  However, small and medium size businesses get all these 35 integrations for free provided they are using the enterprise version of the software (not available on shared cloud).

Support

On the shared cloud deployment (typically for SMBs) support is available from 9am-6pm PST at no additional cost, email support is also available.  24/7 support is included for private cloud deployments and for on-premise deployments support is 20% of the annual license fee but the first year is included for free.  At this time no customer support community currently exists.

Pricing

For the shared cloud deployments (SMBs) it’s $10/user/month.  For private cloud deployments or on-premise solutions of over 200 users this cost can scale down from $10/user/month all the way down to below $3/user/month for large enterprises, for example a large bank with over 100,000 employees.

Maintenance & Upgrades

Companies who go with a private cloud or on-premise deployment choose when they want to role out new updates and there is no charge.  Those on the shared cloud get new updates as soon as they are released which is currently 3 weeks for minor updates and 9 months for major upgrades.  Companies who go with an on-premise deployment pay 20% of the annual licensed fee (included in support cost mentioned above).

Overall direction and strategic vision for the company and industry

Mango Spring believes there will be consolidation in point solutions and that as an industry we will move towards more comprehensive solutions.  A few “winners” will emerge and Mango will be one of them.  Mango also believes that eventually all companies will have an internal platform like Mango which they will use to handle their collaboration and communication.  These platforms will become the standard way that companies communicate with partners, customers, and employees.

Currently Mango does not have have full customer communities on the roadmap but this may change in the future.  Since Mango is currently privately funded they may raise money in the future to grow at an even more rapid pace.  Currently Mango is profitable but they don’t spend a lot on marketing which is where other funding could be useful in the future.  At this point Mango is really looking to improve and expand on the platform with some new things coming in 2012 such as a full knowledge management module and perhaps a CRM piece component.

I also asked Patrick what his thoughts were on the similarity of all the vendors both in terms of functionality and UI.  Patrick responded that Facebook proved that the current UI for vendors works and even though many of them look and feel the same that there are differences when it comes down to the details.

Key differentiating factors from competition (such as Jive, Sharepoint, Yammer, Chatter, and Box)

• Functionality, Mango goes far beyond just the social network and is not just a point solution like Yammer
• Security, Mango goes deeper and offers far more security than anyone else with 3 deployment models and offerings such as mobile device management that others just don’t have
• Integration, 35+ out of the box document management integration’s and can also can do custom integrations for virtually any other platform.

Customization

With Mango Spring you can control everything from the layout and look and feel to enabling/disabling any applications and features that a company wants.  The platform was built in a modular way which gives customers a lot of flexibility.  Mango also has a full open API set as well.

Time to go live

The shared cloud takes just a few minutes to go live.  The on-premise and private cloud take deployments take around 1 week and much of that is waiting for the customer to provide certain specifications.

Overall technology

Mango is not built on any legacy technologies such as Jive which has big problems that they are now trying to retroactively fix to work effectively within today’s enterprise.  The back end is Java based and the front end is Ruby on Rails.  Mango also supports any major relational databases but MySQL is the primary one.  The platform is also SAS 70 Type II compliant, supports 6 languages, is HIPA compliant and Safe Harbor Compliant.

Industry/vertical focus

The issues of communication and collaboration are universal and the Mango Spring customer base is distributed accorss the globe and industries.  Notable customers include: Jive, the US Navy, Toshiba, and Intrado.

Capabilities (customer, partner, employee collaboration)
Employee and partner

My Take

I first found out about Mango Spring over a year and a half ago at a collaboration conference and have since kept in touch with them and kept on eye on what they have been doing.  I must say that I really like the Mango Spring platform and it does offer several unique features that most other vendors don’t have such as real-time video conferencing with up to 50 participants, instant messaging with on-line users which can be used via mobile, web, or desktop browser, drag and drop task management, and a host of other valuable features (check out their feature comparison matrix vs Jive, Yammer, Chatter and Box.

The positioning behind Mango Spring also makes a lot of sense as the core pillars are social networking, document management, idea management, project management, instant messaging, task management, and event management.  With the hopefull addition of a knowledge management component  in 2012 (and perhaps a CRM component) Mango Spring will move from being a collaboration platform to a business management type of platform that includes collaboration.

The look and feel of the product is great and I love the focus on accessibility and usability from pretty much any mobile or tablet device.  Those that have seen platforms such as Yammer won’t see too much in terms of UI differences.  Their three different types of deployment options (private cloud, shared cloud, and on-premise) also allow customers to have great flexibility.

I understand the direction that Mango Spring is taking to become a fully integrated collaboration/business management suite. I’ve used many of the collaboration products out there today and while there are some great products it’s frustrating when a vendor can do something really well such as micrblogging or document management but can’t do something else such as task management.

While the product itself is great the biggest problem Mango Spring faces is that compared to some of the other vendors out there nobody really knows who Mango Spring is which is unfortunate.  The company has taken no financing and unlike many other vendors is actually profitable, yet I don’t know anyone personally (or have heard of) who uses them.  They also need to work hard on securing some enterprise customers if they want to really penetrate that market because as of now the enterprise customers are few and far between.  The resources and thought leadership component at Mango Spring is definitely lacking and something I suspect they will need to improve upon quickly.

The technology/product is great but I think 2012 is really going to be an important year for them and a time where they should focus on marketing, lead nurturing, education, and thought leadership. Everyone who is familiar with Jive or Yammer needs to also be familiar with Mango Spring.  On a side note I’d be quite curious to hear from Jive, Yammer, Box, and Chatter as to what they think about the feature comparison matrix mentioned 5 paragraphs up.

Mango Spring also currently does not support any type of customer community which is something that I’m noticing more and more companies are starting to look for (yes, even in a collaboration platform).

Overall I think Mango Spring has a bright future ahead.

To find out more about Mango Spring visit their site at MangoSpring.com

Screenshots



Emergent Collaboration Vendor Review: oneDrum

December 16th, 2011

On Friday’s I’ll be reviewing a vendor in the emergent collaboration space and will provide an overview on that vendor which includes aspects from leadership and vision to technology and market focus. If you are vendor that would like to participate, please contact me (email is in the sidebar as is the twitter link). The goal of these posts is not to bash or praise vendors but to simply offer an objective view on what various vendors offer so that YOU can decide if they are a good fit for your business. Every post will cover the same elements for different vendors. If you have ideas or recommendations for other items to be covered in these posts then please let me know and I will consider them.

This week I’m taking a look at oneDrum. oneDrum is headquartered in Scotland and currently has 10 employees. The best way to visualize oneDrum is as a platform that provides a Google Docs experience but in Microsoft Office. At this point oneDrum is live but they haven’t 100% launched yet. I spoke with Jasper Westaway the CEO.

Integration capabilities
At this point oneDrum focuses on integration with Microsoft Office products such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. In the future there will be an API for enabling other 3rd party applications as well.

Support
oneDrum has two types of customers, those that are on the freemium model and those that are on the paid model. Enterprise customers pay 18% of the annual license for support and maintenance. However, there is also a level of free online support and a community, which usually responds to issues within just a few hours.

Pricing
The basic paid version is $10/user/month but for the enterprise this is $15-$20/user/month. The higher fee is due to different kinds of security and LDAP integration.

Maintenance & Upgrades
Right now minor upgrades are released around every 2 weeks but once the product is completely launched this will most likely be 1x/month with major upgrades around 2x/year. The current roadmap takes oneDrum into 2013. The focus thereafter will be on oneDrum as a synchronization platform.

Overall direction/strategic vision for the company and industry
As a company, oneDrum is trying to be a synchronization platform. In the future they will begin exposing SDKs and APIs actively to allow for further integration and development. oneDrum is currently in the process of raising more money and is currently funded from the UK. In 2012 they are expecting to spend more time in California but this will be to focus on the commercial side of the business, that is marketing, sales, and business development. Their goal is to really focus on the enterprise with the Microsoft Office solution.

As an industry oneDrum believes that many people don’t really understand how hard synchronization is. In their opinion nobody will ever build a non-networked application again because it just doesn’t make sense to do so. At this point they see the market as an incredibly immature marketplace that nobody really knows that well. Jasper (the CEO) mentioned that Sharepoint is not really a Gorilla like everyone things; it has perhaps around 10 million users. Some vendors are starting to own specific verticals. Jive for example owns the finance market but there is still lot of mess and a lot of noise. There needs to be more differentiation amongst the products and Jasper correctly pointed out that it’s hard to see them all surviving. Jasper also mentioned that Microsoft needs to come up with a credible replacement for Sharepoint which I thought was interesting, the reasoning behind this is that most companies can indeed get sharepoint at a low cost but then they end up spending a lot of money on maintenance.

Jasper and oneDrum believe that all companies are moving towards a more integrated collaboration experience.

Key differentiating factors from competition

  • Real real activity in Microsoft office, as someone is typing you can see it just like in a wiki
  • Modern architecture, light weight, and no dedicated servers
  • Enterprise-grade file sharing

Customization
At this point there is no customization available for oneDrum

Time to go live
It takes just a few minutes to go live with oneDrum.

Overall technology
Not specified

Industry/vertical focus
oneDrum has seen four key verticals which have been fast adopters: consultancies, energy companies, logistics providers, and education companies. The focus is on the enterprise but oneDrum also offers solutions for small and medium size businesses.

Capabilities (customer, partner, employee collaboration)
Employee collaboration

My take

I haven’t seen any other vendor do exactly what oneDrum does.  You may recall that Jive purchased a vendor called OffiSync which also built this social and collaborative layer on top of Microsoft Office but from what I recall it wasn’t as clean and didn’t do as much.  Since most large organizations (and most organizations period) use Microsoft Office it only makes sense to use this as a vehicle to get into the enterprise.  The approach here is not to deploy a collaboration platform where employees upload and share documents but to actually use the place where these documents are created as the basis for collaboration.

If you have ever used a Wiki or Gdocs you are already quite familiar with what I’m talking about, no imagine being able to have this some collaborative and social layer but within something like Microsoft Word, pretty cool huh?  You can see who is working on the document, where they are working on it, and can even interact with people via messaging while they are working on the document with you.  All in all it’s definitely an interesting approach to document collaboration in the workplace.  However, oneDrum itself is not full-scale collaboration platform.  Meaning you wouldn’t use it as a way to ask and answer questions from a network, to find subject matter experts, or as a platform to submit and share ideas within your enterprise.  The type of collaboration that oneDrum at this point is specifically focusing on is on document collaboration.  I can easily see some interesting partnerships between something like oneDrum and other niche collaboration vendors.

I’m not sure how ready oneDrum is for the enterprise yet as security and technology issues were not specified during my interview.  Also, I think the price point for oneDrum is a bit high considering what I’m seeing other vendors charging.  Overall I like their approach to building on top of Microsoft Office and I think 2012 is going to be an interesting year for them as they fully launch their product.

To find out more about oneDrum you can visit their site at oneDrum.com or email them directly at enquiries@onedrum.com, make sure to reference the article (no I don’t get paid any referrals for any of these articles).

Screenshots

Emergent Collaboration Vendor Review: Qontext

December 9th, 2011

On Friday’s I’ll be reviewing a vendor in the emergent collaboration space and will provide an overview on that vendor which includes aspects from leadership and vision to technology and market focus. If you are vendor that would like to participate, please contact me (email is in the sidebar as is the twitter link). The [...]

Emergent Collaboration Vendor Review: Jostle

December 2nd, 2011

On Friday’s I’ll be reviewing a vendor in the emergent collaboration space and will provide an overview on that vendor which includes aspects from leadership and vision to technology and market focus. If you are vendor that would like to participate, please contact me (email is in the sidebar as is the twitter link). The [...]

Emergent Collaboration Vendor Review: Newsgator

November 4th, 2011

Every Friday I’ll be reviewing a vendor in the emergent collaboration space and will provide an overview on that vendor which includes aspects from leadership and vision to technology and market focus. If you are vendor that would like to participate, please contact me (email is in the sidebar as is the twitter link). The [...]

Emergent Collaboration Vendor Review: Moxie Software

October 28th, 2011

Every Friday I’ll be reviewing a vendor in the emergent collaboration space and will provide an overview on that vendor which includes aspects from leadership and vision to technology and market focus. If you are vendor that would like to participate, please contact me (email is in the sidebar as is the twitter link). The [...]