Archive for February, 2013

Humans are Taking Jobs Away From Robots, Not Vice Versa

February 28th, 2013

First let me set the stage.

I’m a big fan of Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson who are the authors of Race Against the Machine, a book which explore how technological innovation is impacting our jobs, skills, and wages- more specifically how technology is taking our jobs.  Andrew McAfee was featured in my book, The Collaborative Organization, and Erik was one of the people who endorsed the book and is featured on the back cover where he said:

“Most business leaders understand how critical collaborative tools are to the success of their companies. What they need now is a guide, based on hard data and practical experiences, that shows how to put those tools to work.  Jacob Morgan fills that need with this book.”

Recently John Hagel posted a video called “Rethinking Race Against the Machines” which makes some great points, (seen below).  John suggests that it’s not technology that is taking our jobs, it’s the way we designed and think about work.

Most organizations and educational institutions were modeled after the military which meant everyone dresses the same, acts the same, gets access only to relevant information to get their jobs done, works a set schedule, and basically works like a “drone.”  Now, technology has finally caught up to the point where robots, drones, and automation can finally do the jobs and perform the tasks that our organizations have been assigning to humans this whole time.

It’s no wonder that synonyms for “work” include: drudgery, daily grind, and struggle and synonyms for “employee” include: slave, cog, and servant.  Think about it for a minute.  The typical set up for a company used to be that an employee comes to work and puts in as many hours as possible and asks as few questions as possible.  Employees weren’t asked to think, nope, that was the job for the great managers.  The regular employees were just supposed to “do” what the managers told them to do as quickly and as efficiently as possible, sounds like the perfect fit for something that could be automated or handed over to a drone to do right?

So here we are, our companies constructed in a way that designs work for robots and drones only it’s the humans who are doing these jobs, or at least, they were.  Now, old-school managers can finally have their wish, an army of drones who are the perfect workers, they don’t think, they work long hours, they don’t ask questions, and they get things done.

As the title of the post says, it’s not the robots that are taking away our jobs, it’s the humans who are fighting to take away jobs which were designed for robots.

We are finally seeing an evolution in the way we work and the smart companies are investing in the tools and strategies that are required to survive and progress in the “future of work.”  Organizations are starting to realize that success comes from innovation, creating an engaged and collaborative workforce, creating flexible work environments, empowering employees, leveraging collective intelligence, and capturing and retaining knowledge.  This is the type of environment that robots cannot succeed in.  These types of companies and jobs are designed for humans.  The challenge many companies face now is they are rethinking how work is done while trying to adapt to changes in behavior and technology that are shaping the future of work.

The only thing businesses can be certain of is uncertainty.  In that type of environment, companies that connect and engage their employees and information will win.

Why Did Yahoo! Ban Telecommuting for Employees?

February 26th, 2013

If you haven’t heard the recent news, Yahoo! decided to ban telecommuting and is now forcing all employees to physically come into the office to work and if they can’t or won’t then they can find a job elsewhere.  At first glance this seems a bit counter intuitive to what many other companies are doing.  Here we have organizations such as TELUS, Lowe’s, Electronic Arts, IBM, and many others around the world who are implementing collaborative tools and strategies to enable a more connected and engaged workforce with flexible environments; and then we have Yahoo! that is telling everyone that they now need to come into the office to work.

Before I even heard about the news I wrote an article on why employees should be allowed to work from home which looks at the many benefits and includes several pieces of research.

In the memo that she sent out, Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer said:

“To become the absolute best place to work, communication and collaboration will be important, so we need to be working side-by-side.  That is why it is critical that we are all present in our offices.  Some of the best decisions and insights come from hallway and cafeteria discussions, meeting new people, and impromptu team meetings.  Speed and quality are often sacrificed when we work from home.  We need to be one Yahoo, and that starts with physically being together.”

While I do agree that collaboration and communication are crucial I don’t believe that being in the same office necessarily drives that.  In fact in an article I wrote a little while back I took a look at how distance impacts collaboration.  The visual below shows that once employees are around 160-200 feet apart that communication virtually ceases to exist altogether.

ScreenHunter_02-Aug.-21-21.32

I also haven’t seen any specific studies which say that  speed and quality of work is sacrificed by allowing and supporting employees to work from home.  In fact in the article I mentioned above I found research to show quite the opposite.  However, it’s not hard to find some stats and research online to support any position you want to take.  I believe that Mayer’s reasoning behind this sounds a bit “old-school.”  Many of the companies I work with are actually taking the exact opposite approach of what Mayer is suggesting.  Collaboration, communication, and innovation can be accomplished through remote working with the proper use of social and collaborative tools and strategies.  Chess Media Group alone has put together many case studies on collaboration which show this.

It’s interesting because the stock price of Yahoo! has actually been doing quite well.  I think what we are seeing on the surface vs the actual deeper reasoning behind what Mayer is suggesting are very different.  As far as I know Yahoo! hasn’t implemented any type of social collaboration solution (which also means no training, education, adoption strategies, etc).  I think what Yahoo! is really trying to do here is just regroup and get everyone back on the same page in order to build a successful framework and approach for collaboration.  It seems that this was never done to begin with which is a problem.  If the foundation was never set in place for building a collaborative organization then Yahoo! now needs to stake one step back in order to take two steps forward later.  I don’t think and can’t imagine this being a permanent change over at Yahoo!  Perhaps there was just certain issues with specific teams or groups over at the company and a blanket policy was issued in an attempt to try to rectify that.  The truth is we really don’t know why Yahoo! is doing this.

What I can say is that the smart and progressive companies who are looking at the future of work are investing heavily in social and collaborative tools and strategies to build a connected, engaged, and smarter workforce.  The research exists to support doing this as do the case studies and examples.  I really hope (and am trying to believe) that Mayer’s reasoning for forcing everyone to come to work goes beyond what she said in her quote, and I think it does.

 

How to Avoid Losing Your Collaboration “Steam”

February 20th, 2013

Collaboration initiatives for virtually all companies take time and we’re not talking about a few hours or days, we’re talking about many months and oftentimes years.  During this period these collaboration projects can stall- start up and get momentum, then die off a few months later only to be resumed months after that.  Those who [...]

Why Employees Should be Allowed to Work From Home

February 14th, 2013

Today around 10% of Americans are regularly working from home, and for good reason.  Many organizations today are starting to implement flexible work environments where employees can either work part time or full time from home or from a cafe, a bookstore, or anywhere else.  There really is no longer a good reason to force [...]

Where is SIRI for the Enterprise?

February 12th, 2013

If you have one of the newer versions of the iphone then you are more than likely familiar with Siri; the “personal assistant” on your phone that you can talk to get help with anything from directions to recipes.  Unfortunately the concept is at this point, much more valuable than Siri itself.  Now while Siri [...]

New Whitepaper: Common Collaboration Problems that Organizations are Faced With

February 7th, 2013

As part of our ongoing effort to provide some much needed educational content around collaboration, we have released another whitepaper on The Common Collaboration Problems that organizations are facing.  The purpose of this resource is to explore some of the common challenges that organizations are being faced with, regardless of their industry or company size. [...]